AD
元器件交易网讯 2月27日消息，据外媒报道，在今年的世界移动大会（MWC）上，Mozilla推出一款标价仅为25美元的概念机，并自称这是一款真正意义上的廉价智能机。但是该机用户体验却差到极点。
据悉，该机由Mozilla携手展讯联合推出，沿袭最初的iPhone手机规格，3.5英寸320x480屏，200万摄像头，无3G连接，这是相似之处。然而，该机内置展讯芯片，搭载火狐操作系统，配备相当糟糕的LCD屏幕，运行极其缓慢，比Mozilla合作伙伴推出的新一代手机要滞后很多，用户体验令人抓狂。
这样的价格搭配这样的配置似乎也合情合理，但问题是这款手机能叫智能机吗？这款手机可以访问YouTube、照相、浏览网页，但是它反应如此之慢，以至于用户可能根本不想用它来做这些事情。
2014年的世界移动大会上主题之一就是关注低端手机市场。展会上一张标价35美元智能手机吸引众人眼球，业界甚至猜测这类低价手机可能吸引下一个10亿用户。不过，小编认为，如果低价智能机都是如此配置的话，那很难吸引用户购买，更别说是10亿用户了。
（元器件交易网董蕾 编译）
外媒原文如下：
At this year"s Mobile World Congress, Mozilla is pushing its self-appointed mission to create a truly affordable smartphone with the demonstration of a $25 proof of concept device. Built by chip partner Spreadtrum, it runs the latest version of Firefox OS, but unfortunately does so with considerably more lag than the new generation of handsetsintroduced by Mozilla"s partners. The basic spec is reminiscent of the original iPhone, with a 3.5-inch, 320 x 480 display, 2-megapixel camera, and no 3G connectivity. That"s where the similarities end, however, as the Firefox OS prototype uses a quite terrible LCD display and offers a maddeningly slow user experience.
These sacrifices may appear justified by the device"s rock-bottom price, but they also place a question mark over whether it can really be considered a smartphone. You can access YouTube, take pictures, and browse the web on it, but the phone"s responsiveness is so sluggish that you probably won"t want to do any of those things.
CHEAP, BUT NOT CHEERFUL
Aimed at the most price-sensitive segment of the smartphone market, this $25 prototype wants to bring the capabilities of web and email access to those who can"t afford even Nokia"s entry-level Asha handsets. It has room for a pair of SIM cards, and though its physical design isn"t indicative of what retail units will look like, it"s built to a reasonable standard. The hardware platform could scale lower, too, with options of 2.6-inch QVGA displays allied to a BlackBerry-esque QWERTY keyboard. In essence, these are 2014"s bargain-priced recreations of 2007"s best phones — or they would be if the user experience weren"t as disappointing as it is today.
